Written by the Chief of Department of Common Analysis of the Eastern Partnership
The strategic landscape of Eastern Europe has undergone a fundamental transformation since 2022, shifting from a policy of gradual association to one of high stakes enlargement driven by existential security imperatives. The Association Trio Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia now occupy the center of a geopolitical contest that tests the European Unions institutional agility, its commitment to democratic values, and its capacity for internal reform. By early 2026, the trajectories of these three states have diverged sharply, creating a complex multispeed integration process where technical progress often collides with political obstruction and domestic volatility.1 While Ukraine and Moldova have demonstrated unprecedented resilience and reform momentum, Georgia has faced a period of systemic democratic backsliding that has effectively paralyzed its accession aspirations.4
Ukraine: State Resilience and the Institutional Mechanics of Accession
The integration of Ukraine into the European Union represents the most complex enlargement endeavor in the Unions history, taking place against the backdrop of a full scale war of aggression. As of early 2026, the process is characterized by a dual track reality: a technical track moving at record speed and a political track frequently hampered by member state vetoes and the uncertainties of a future peace settlement.6
The Technical Breakthrough: From Application to Screening Completion
Ukraines journey from its formal application on February 28, 2022, to the successful completion of the screening process in September 2025 serves as a testament to the endurance of its state institutions.9 The screening process, which typically takes years, was finalized in an unprecedentedly short period, allowing the European Commission to assess that all six negotiating clusters Fundamentals, Internal Market, Competitiveness and Inclusive Growth, Green Agenda and Sustainable Connectivity, Resources, Agriculture and Cohesion, and External Relations are technically ready to be opened.11
This progress has been facilitated by the Lviv format, an informal ministerial mechanism
established by the Danish presidency and the European Commission to frontload technical work even when formal clusters remain blocked by political actors like Hungary.6 Through this format, the Ukrainian government has received detailed benchmarks and deep state bureaucratic requirements that would normally be delivered only after a formal intergovernmental conference.6 This has allowed Kyiv to begin the unpacking of criteria for chapters related to the judiciary, public procurement, and financial control, assigning specific numerical identifiers to indicators such as IBM 23.3.3 (Quality of the Judiciary) to track reform implementation.7
Key Milestones in Ukraines EU Accession (2022 2026)
● Formal Membership Application: February 28, 2022 (Completed 9)
● EU Candidate Status Granted: June 23, 2022 (Completed 10)
● Opening of Accession Negotiations: June 25, 2024 (Formal Launch 9) ● Completion of Bilateral Screening: September 2025 (Completed 11)
● Lviv Informal Ministerial Meeting: December 11, 2025 (Progress Confirmed 12) ● Roam Like at Home Implementation: January 1, 2026 (Integration Step 11) ● Proposed Accelerated Accession: January 1, 2027 (Under Discussion 8)
The Geopolitical Pivot: Accession as a Security Guarantee
A defining feature of the 2025 2026 period is the shift in narrative regarding the timing of accession. Influential voices within the European Commission and some member states, as well as mediators of peace proposals between Kyiv and Moscow, have introduced the prospect of a January 1, 2027, accession date for Ukraine.2 This ambitious goal is framed as a critical security guarantee, leveraging Article 42.7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) regarding mutual defense.8
This fast track scenario creates a paradox within the enlargement framework. While the political imperative for anchoring Ukraine in the West is urgent, the technical standards of the Copenhagen criteria remain strict. Analysts observe that such a move would require the EU to reconsider its traditional logic, potentially admitting Ukraine before the full completion of all 33 negotiating chapters, followed by a long transitional period where reforms continue post accession.8 However, this approach faces resistance from states like Germany, where leadership emphasizes that full membership must follow full reforms.6
Economic Reconstruction and the RDNA5 Assessment
The economic integration of Ukraine is inseparable from the massive reconstruction efforts necessitated by the invasion. The fifth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA5), released in February 2026, calculates the total cost of reconstruction and recovery at $588 billion over the next decade.13 This figure reflects a staggering increase from previous years, driven by intensified attacks on energy, transport, and port infrastructure throughout 2025.13
The €50 billion Ukraine Facility (2024 2027) provides the financial backbone for this transition, linking disbursements to the Ukraine Plan reform agenda.4In early 2026, the IMF also approved a new 48 month arrangement totaling $8.1 billion, contributing to a total international support package for 2026 estimated at $136.5 billion.16 These facilities prioritize macrofiscal stability and the strengthening of anticorruption frameworks, which are viewed as prerequisites for both private investment and EU membership.13
RDNA5: Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs (10 Year Estimate)
● Transport Sector: $96 Billion
● Energy Sector: $91 Billion
● Housing Sector: $90 Billion
● Commerce and Industry: $63 Billion
● Agriculture Sector: $55 Billion
● Explosives Hazard Management/Demining: $28 Billion
● Total Estimated Cost (RDNA5): $588 Billion 13
Sectoral Integration: Trade, Minerals, and Energy
Beyond the formal chapters, Ukraine has achieved significant sectoral integration. The review of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), upgraded in October 2025, has introduced reciprocal liberalization.17 Ukraine now supplies a dominant share of certain agricultural imports to the EU, including 94% of sunflower oil and 67% of maize as of 2024.18 However, the emergency brake mechanism activated in May 2024 for sensitive products like maize and poultry began to show its effects in early 2025, tempering trade volumes in these categories.18
Furthermore, the United States Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund (URIF) began operations in early 2026, selecting projects valued at $1.2 billion, with a primary focus on energy security and critical minerals extraction.20 This initiative reflects a strategic alignment where Ukraines resources are viewed as essential assets for a more resilient and competitive European Union.1
Moldova: Institutional Maturation and the Challenge of Reintegration
Moldovas progress during the 2025 2026 cycle has been remarkable, with the European Commission applauding it for the biggest one year progress of all candidates in its annual reports.4 Unlike the more volatile situation in Georgia, Moldova has successfully consolidated its pro European trajectory through decisive elections and a systematic alignment with the EU acquis.21
The 2025 Election and Democratic Consolidation
The parliamentary elections of September 28, 2025, served as a third and final test of Moldovas democratic resilience.21 Despite unprecedented foreign interference and hybrid threats from Russia, the pro European majority was reaffirmed, giving the government of Maia Sandu a clear mandate to accelerate accession related reforms.21
This political stability has allowed Chișinău to tackle the Fundamentals cluster with rigor. Key milestones include the adoption of roadmaps for the rule of law and democratic institutions, as well as the comprehensive vetting and appointment of judges and prosecutors to ensure the independence of the judiciary.22 The 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index showed Moldova reaching its highest score since 1999 (43 out of 100), signaling a measurable improvement in the fight against high level corruption.23
The Growth Plan and Economic Convergence
In October 2024, the EU presented the €1.9 billion Growth Plan for Moldova, the most significant financial package in the countrys history.25 The plan is designed to double the size of the Moldovan economy over the next decade through several priority pillars:
1. Fundamental Reforms: Linking funding to indicators in judicial reform, public finance management, and the green transition.26
2. Single Market Access: Facilitating Moldovas entry into the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) and the Roam Like at Home initiative, which became active on January 1, 2026.11 3. Connectivity Infrastructure: Investing in energy and transport networks to bridge the connectivity gap with the EU.26
The impact of SEPA membership has been immediate; in the first month, transaction volumes rose by €300 million, resulting in an estimated €1.4 million in savings for citizens and businesses on transfer fees.23 Additionally, the first regular payment of €18.9 million under the Growth Plan was unlocked in early 2025 following the assessment of four key reform indicators.26
Transnistria: Energy Leverage and the Cypriot Model
The unresolved conflict in Transnistria remains a central variable in Moldovas accession narrative. As of 2026, the Moldovan government and its EU partners have adopted a two step accession strategy, often referred to as the Cypriot model.28 This approach allows for the possibility of Moldova joining the EU without effective control over the breakaway region, while pausing the application of the acquis in Transnistria until peaceful reunification is achieved.28
The geopolitical context of the conflict shifted dramatically in early 2025 when Ukraine refused to extend the transit contract for Russian gas.28 This led to a severe energy crisis in Transnistria, which has since become dependent on gas supplies flowing through EU territory (via Hungary and Romania) and managed by Chișinău.28 This vulnerability has provided the Moldovan
government with unprecedented leverage, allowing it to extract concessions such as the dismantling of illegal control posts and the release of political prisoners.28 Furthermore, with 80% of Transnistrian exports now directed toward the EU market, the economic cooption of the regions elites notably the Sheriff holding company is viewed as a viable path toward gradual reintegration.28
Preparing for a Larger Union: The EUs Role
The integration of Moldova is also a test of the EUs capacity for institutional reform. In December 2025, the General Affairs Council took note of Moldovas adoption of essential reform roadmaps and looked forward to the opening of clusters without delay.22 However, the EU must also strengthen its own budgetary and absorption mechanisms to ensure that the eventual membership of Moldova targeted for 2030 strengthens rather than strains the European project.24
Georgia: Systemic Backsliding and the Authoritarian Crisis
In sharp contrast to the momentum in Ukraine and Moldova, the situation in Georgia as of early 2026 is defined by a rapid erosion of democratic standards and a de facto suspension of the accession process.4 The 2025 enlargement package confirms that Georgia, once a beacon of democratic transition, is now undergoing an acute authoritarian crisis that has reversed nearly two decades of progress.5
Legislative Warfare and the Dismantling of Civic Space
The ruling Georgian Dream party has implemented a series of repressive laws that have targeted the core of the countrys vibrant civil society and independent media.21 The primary instruments of this regression include:
● The Foreign Agents Law (May 2024): Requiring organizations receiving more than 20% of their funding from abroad to register as pursuing the interests of a foreign power. Enforcement began in June 2025.3
● Amendments to the Law on Grants (January 2026): These amendments broadened the definition of a grant and made receiving foreign funding without government approval a criminal offense.32
● Electoral Code Amendments: Changes introduced ahead of the October 2025 municipal elections reportedly created obstacles for local observers and media.32
These measures have transformed dissent into a criminalized activity and led to a constitutional lawsuit seeking to declare three major opposition parties unconstitutional.32 Furthermore, following the governments November 2024 decision to suspend accession efforts until 2028, widespread protests were met with disproportionate violence, police brutality, and politically motivated prosecutions.33
Geopolitical Realignment and Declining Alignment
Georgias foreign policy orientation has increasingly diverged from that of the European Union. By early 2026, the countrys alignment with the EUs Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) had fallen to just 40%.32Instead of prioritizing Euro Atlantic integration, the ruling party has deepened cooperation with Russia, China, and Iran.32
The EUs response has been increasingly critical. In January 2025, the Union suspended visa free travel for holders of Georgian diplomatic passports.3 A report presented to the European Parliaments Committee on Foreign Affairs in February 2026 supported the introduction of targeted sanctions against Bidzina Ivanishvili, as well as senior members of the ruling team, judges, and prosecutors responsible for human rights violations.32 The report warned that continued regression could lead to a total suspension of the visafree regime for all Georgian citizens.32
Assessment of Georgias Preparation (Selected Chapters 2025 2026)
● Cluster 1: The Fundamentals: Significant Backsliding (Negative 5)
● Fight against Corruption: Backsliding (Negative 5)
● Freedom of Movement for Workers: Early Stage (Stagnant 5)
● Public Procurement: Some Level (Stagnant 5)
● Economic Criteria (Market Economy): Functioning Market (Positive (Stable) 5)
The Occupied Territories: Annexation by Increment
While Tbilisi drifts away from the West, Russia has intensified its borderization of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.32 As of May 2025, approximately 24.8 miles (60%) of the administrative boundary line in Abkhazia and 55.9 miles (39%) in South Ossetia had been fenced.35 Moscow has also simplified the process for residents of these regions to acquire Russian citizenship, removing requirements for language proficiency or knowledge of Russian history.35
The economic situation in the occupied regions remains precarious. In late 2024, Russia halted social payments and electricity subsidies to Abkhazia to pressure the de facto leadership into approving an investment agreement favoring Russian investors.35 This move triggered Abkhazias worst energy crisis in recent history, demonstrating that Russia remains the ultimate arbiter of power in the occupied territories, even as the Georgian government avoids confronting these hybrid threats directly.3
Horizontal Integration Themes: Disability Rights and Inclusive Reforms
A decisive test for the EU accession of the Association Trio is the degree to which formal legislative changes translate into real improvements for marginalized populations, specifically persons with disabilities. The 2025 Enlargement Package, alongside reports from the European
Disability Forum (EDF), identifies disability inclusion as a critical metric for a countrys readiness to join a values based union.4
Ukraine and Moldova: Transitioning to Community Support
In Ukraine, despite the wartime conditions, there has been a political determination to maintain progress on disability inclusion.21 The 2025 Report recognizes resilience in this area but stresses that formal institutional reforms must be accompanied by deinstitutionalization a shift away from centralized care toward community based support services.4 Ukraine is expected to adopt legislation on the rehabilitation of persons with disabilities in line with the Ukraine Plan in 2026.21
Similarly, Moldova has been applauded for making social inclusion a priority within its human rights agenda.21 However, the Commission has urged the authorities to address instances of ill treatment in residential institutions and to ensure sustainable funding for community based care.21 For both countries, the upcoming phases of accession negotiations are expected to be disability inclusive, with the active participation of representative organizations of persons with disabilities.4
Georgia: The Warning of Exclusion
The regression in Georgia is also reflected in the field of disability rights. The 2025 Report documents that persons with disabilities continue to face systemic barriers and that the government remains reliant on a medical model of disability rather than a human rights oriented one.21 Labor market participation remains low, and inclusive education gaps persist.21 The EDF report presents Georgia as a warning: without a commitment to inclusion and the rule of law, progress toward EU membership cannot be meaningful.4
EU Institutional Reform: Preparing for a Union of 30+ Members
The potential accession of Ukraine, Moldova, and other candidates by 2030 has forced the European Union to reconsider its own internal operating system. As of early 2026, the debate on internal reforms has risen to the top of the strategic agenda, as leaders recognize that the Union must be enlargement ready.31
The Reform Imperative: QMV and Budgetary Adjustments
Central to the institutional debate is the transition from unanimity to Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) for intermediate technical steps in the enlargement process.2 This reform is viewed as a way to prevent single member states from blocking the entire enlargement train over bilateral or
political grievances, as seen during the December 2025 General Affairs Council where a Hungarian veto prevented the adoption of formal conclusions.2
Proposals for reinforced QMV requiring 65% of member states representing 72% of the EU population have surfaced as a middle ground to boost efficiency without requiring full treaty changes.37 Furthermore, the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) will need to account for the massive agricultural and structural funding requirements of an enlarged Union, which has historically been a point of contention among frugal members and net recipients.39
Staged Integration and Safeguards
The EU is increasingly adopting a model of staged integration, where candidate countries are phased in to specific policies and programs conditional on reform progress.4 To manage the risks of this gradual expansion, the Commission has proposed stronger accession treaty safeguards to prevent democratic backsliding after a country has joined.4 Candidates might also be expected to accept temporary restrictions on their use of veto powers immediately after accession to ensure the Unions decision making capacity is not paralyzed.37
Strategic EU Reform Options for Enlargement (2025 2026)
● Fundamental Reform Now (Maximalists): Immediate treaty change to deepen integration and remove vetoes.36
● Gradual Progressive Reform (Realists): Progressively adapting operating systems in tandem with enlargement waves.36
● Lisbon Plus (Cautious Realists): Using existing passerelle clauses to expand QMV without new treaties.36
● Status Quo (Minimalists): Maintaining current decision making rules; risks paralysis in an EU of 30+.36
The Role of Civil Society as an Integration Catalyst
In all three Trio countries, civil society organizations (CSOs) serve as the transmission belt between EU standards and domestic reality.40 As of 2026, CSOs are increasingly acting as advocacy roadmaps, using the annual Enlargement Reports to track government commitments and push for inclusive reforms.21
In Ukraine and Moldova, CSOs have remained active despite martial law and hybrid threats, providing essential democratic oversight and humanitarian support.21In contrast, the Georgian civil society is currently under siege, with its ability to promote reforms severely curtailed by the Foreign Agents law and political harassment.3 The divergence in the treatment of civil society is perhaps the most reliable leading indicator of a countrys long term integration prospects.
Conclusions: The Outlook for 2030
The current situation of integration for Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine in 2026 is a study in geopolitical contrast. Ukraine has achieved a level of institutional readiness that makes a 2030 or
even 2027 accession date a technical possibility, though it remains a political high wire act contingent on the wars outcome.6 Moldova has consolidated its position as a success story of reform, using energy leverage to potentially resolve its frozen conflict while moving steadily toward the Single Market.23
Georgia, however, stands at a decisive juncture of a different kind. Its trajectory toward full authoritarianism has alienated its European partners and left its candidate status purely symbolic.4 The open window for enlargement remains, but as the 2025 package reinforces, the process remains strictly merit based. For the Association Trio, the path to 2030 will be defined not by their geographic proximity to Europe, but by their internal resilience to authoritarianism and their commitment to the fundamental values of the European Union.
Works cited
1. Enlargement Package marks a turn in policy to the East, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.epc.eu/publication/Enlargement-Package-marks-a-turn-in-policy-to-the-East 558a70/
2. Analysis – The State of EU Enlargement at the Outset of 2026, accessed March 6, 2026, https://icds.ee/static/icds_analysis_the_state_of_eu_enlargement_at_the_outset_of_2026_b lockmans_emerson_february_2026.pdf
3. The Impact of Candidate Status in Georgia and Moldova – German Marshall Fund, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.gmfus.org/news/impact-candidate-status-georgia-and-moldova 4. New 2025 EU enlargement reports on Ukraine, Moldova and …, accessed March 6, 2026, https://easpd.eu/news-detail/new-2025-eu-enlargement-reports-on-ukraine-moldova-and-g eorgia/
5. 2025 EU Enlargement Report on Georgia | EEAS, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/georgia/2025-eu-enlargement-report-georgia_en?s =221
6. Ukraine’s accession to the EU: so close, yet so far away, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/en/cp_article/ukraines-accession-to-the-eu-so-close-yet-so -far-away/
7. Full EU benchmarks for Ukraine: what Kyiv must do to join …, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/eng/articles/2026/02/23/7231766/
8. 2025 showed Ukraine’s EU accession is linked to peace talks, accessed March 6, 2026, https://newunionpost.eu/2025/12/31/ukraine-eu-accession-peace-talks-2025/ 9. Ukraine – Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood – European …, accessed March 6, 2026, https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/countries/ukraine_en
10. Accession of Ukraine to the European Union – Wikipedia, accessed March 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Ukraine_to_the_European_Union 11. 16933/25 1 Council of the European Union The Presidency notes that its proposed text for draft Council conclusions received the, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16933-2025-INIT/en/pdf 12. Informal meeting of EU ministers for European affairs took place in Lviv: key results,
accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/u-lvovi-vidbulas-neformalna-zustrich-ministriv-krain-ies -u-spravakh-ievropy-kliuchovi-pidsumky
13. Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment Released – World Bank, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/02/23/updated-ukraine-recovery-a nd-reconstruction-needs-assessment-released
14. Ukraine: $588 billion recovery cost over the next 10 years – UN News, accessed March 6, 2026, https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/02/1167016
15. Potential enlargement of the European Union – Wikipedia, accessed March 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_enlargement_of_the_European_Union 16. ukraine – request for an extended arrangement under the extended fund facility and cancellation of the – IMF, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2026/english/1ukrea2026001-source-pdf. pdf
17. EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area | Access2Markets, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/eu-ukraine-deep-and-comprehensiv e-free-trade-area
18. Why the EU-Ukraine DCFTA review matters – CEPS, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.ceps.eu/why-the-eu-ukraine-dcfta-review-matters/
19. EU trade with Ukraine – latest developments – Statistics Explained – Eurostat, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=EU_trade_with_Ukraine_ -_latest_developments
20. US-Ukraine Investment Fund Picks 8 High-Readiness Projects Worth $1.2B – Kyiv Post, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.kyivpost.com/post/71074
21. 2025 EU Enlargement Reports: Progress, Challenges, and Disability Rights in Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.edf-feph.org/2025-eu-enlargement-reports-progress-challenges-and-disability rights-in-ukraine-moldova-and-georgia/
22. Presidency of the European Council Conclusions on Enlargement – EEAS, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/moldova/presidency-european-council-conclusion s-enlargement_en
23. A new round of EU enlargement: Will Moldova become a success story? – libmod.de, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://libmod.de/en/a-new-round-of-eu-enlargement-will-moldova-become-a-success-stor y/
24. EN EN DRAFT REPORT – European Parliament, accessed March 6, 2026, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-782290_EN.pdf 25. Enlargement – Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia – EU NEIGHBOURS …, accessed March 6, 2026, https://euneighbourseast.eu/enlargement/
26. Reform and Growth Facility for Moldova – Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/funding-technical-assistance/reform-and-growth-facility moldova_en
27. 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy, accessed March 6, 2026, https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/eb69a890-40d6-4696-801e-612d517 09fdd_en?filename=2025+Communication+on+EU+Enlargement+Policy.pdf
28. Reintegration with or without EU enlargement: Can Transnistria be …, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.gssc.lt/en/publication/reintegration-with-or-without-eu-enlargement-can-trans nistria-be-co-opted-in-moldovas-eu-accession-process/
29. Romania monthly briefing: Moldova’s “Two-Step” EU Accession: A Pragmatic Response.. – China-CEE Institute, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://china-cee.eu/2026/02/27/romania-monthly-briefing-moldovas-two-step-eu-accessio n-a-pragmatic-response-to-geopolitical-reality/
30. Transnistria Reemerges as an Obstacle to Moldova Joining the EU, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2025/12/moldova-transnistria-eu-int egration
31. Fundamentals first: Moldova’s progress and challenges on the road to the EU accession – EPC, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.epc.eu/events/fundamentals-first-moldovas-progress-and-challenges-on-the-ro ad-to-the-eu-accession/
32. EU report on Georgia/JAMnews, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://jam-news.net/georgian-government-has-effectively-reversed-its-european-course-eu -foreign-affairs-committee-report-says/
33. Storm on the Shore: Georgia’s Democratic Crisisand Its Implications for Wider Black Sea Security – Platform for Peace and Humanity, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://peacehumanity.org/monitor/storm-on-the-shore-georgias-democratic-crisisand-its-i mplications-for-wider-black-sea-security/
34. Georgia: Freedom in the World 2025 Country Report, accessed March 6, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/country/georgia/freedom-world/2025
35. Update to the Report on Actions Taken by the Russian Federation to Further Consolidate the Occupation of the Georgian Territories of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Update-to-the-Report-on-Actions-Take n-by-the-Russian-Federation-Accessible-12.10.2025.pdf
36. A TEST OF TIMES – Permachange through enlargement and EU reform, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://eu-democracy-reform-observatory.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Enlargement_Re form-Web__1_.pdf
37. A quid pro quo approach to enlargement reform: streamlining accession while safeguarding the Union – Friends of Europe, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.friendsofeurope.org/insights/critical-thinking-a-quid-pro-quo-approach-to-enl argement-reform-streamlining-accession-while-safeguarding-the-union/ 38. The EU failed to adopt its 2025 enlargement conclusions – The New Union Post, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://newunionpost.eu/2025/12/16/eu-enlargement-conclusions-2025-hungary/ 39. Accelerate the accessions: Why faster is better in EU enlargement policy, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://ecfr.eu/publication/accelerate-the-accessions-why-faster-is-better-in-eu-enlargement -policy/
40. Thinking Enlarged in 2026: Leveraging perspectives from future member states, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.epc.eu/publication/thinking-enlarged-in-2026-leveraging-perspectives-from-f uture-member-states/
41. Background note: EU enlargement, internal reforms and rule of law, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://www.parleu2025.dk/-/media/sites/parleu2025/pdf/cosac-nov-dec/background-note– enlargement-and-internal-reforms-en-1.pdf
42. EU and EBRD strengthen support for Moldovan government’s reform agenda, accessed March 6, 2026,
https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/latest-news/eu-and-ebrd-strengthen-support-for-moldova n-governments-reform-agenda/
